Convert the source insight below into 5 posts for {{platform}}, each in a different angle: 1. Story angle (you experienced this, here's what you learned). 2. Contrarian angle (what most people get wrong here). 3. List angle (N signs / N reasons / N steps). 4. Question angle (provocative question + your answer). 5. Before/after angle (a year ago I thought X; now I think Y). Constraints: - Each post stands on its own (no 'read my earlier post for context'). - No marketing verbs: leverage, unlock, empower, transform, revolutionize. - No exclamation marks. - No hashtags. The source insight (one observation, not three): {{source_insight}}
Weekly content batch (5 posts from one insight)
Example output
Source insight: 'Three of our last four churned customers told us they never used the iCloud sync feature - the one we spent a month building.'
Angle 1 (story):
Three of our last four churned customers told us they never used the feature we spent a month building. Here's what that taught me about what users actually want vs. what they tell you they want...
Angle 2 (contrarian):
Most product roadmaps are wrong. Not because the team picked the wrong features - because they asked customers what to build, and customers answered. The thing they actually need? They never name it.
Angle 3 (list):
Four signs the feature you're building won't move retention:
1. Users say 'I'd love that' when asked but never request it unprompted.
2. The competitor that doesn't have it has higher retention.
3. Your most engaged users use the product without it.
4. The team most excited to build it isn't the team that talks to customers.
Angle 4 (question):
If 75% of your churned customers never used the feature you spent a month building, was the feature wrong - or were the customers? I think I know which is the easier mistake to make.
Angle 5 (before/after):
A year ago I would've doubled down: 'they need to discover the sync feature - more onboarding, better copy.' Now: kill the feature, refund the time, ship the thing they actually use 10x more often.
Common mistakes
Don't post all 5 angles in the same week - they'll cannibalize. Spread them across 2-3 weeks so each gets its own audience surface. Also: do not let the model add hashtags. AI hashtag suggestions are uniformly bad and signal AI authorship louder than the post copy does. Third mistake: pasting an insight that's actually 5 insights. The prompt produces 5 angles on ONE insight - if you give it 'we shipped X, also Y broke, also we hired Z,' the output will be 5 mediocre posts about three different things instead of 5 sharp posts about one thing.
More from AI Prompts for Solopreneurs
Cold outreach (3 lines, no template feel)
Write a cold outreach email in exactly three lines: 1. One specific thing the recipient said, posted, shipped, or built (not a generic…
Customer onboarding email sequence
Write a 4-email onboarding sequence for a new client. The sequence: - Email 1 (within 1 hour of contract signed): welcome + name the next…
The uncomfortable email (refund / scope / payment)
Draft a reply to an uncomfortable client situation. Structure: 1. Acknowledge the situation directly (no 'I'm so sorry to bring this…
Why it works
The Sunday-night 'I have nothing to post' problem is universal and entirely solvable. This prompt converts one insight (a thing you noticed this week, a customer quote, a result, a contrarian take) into 5 LinkedIn posts written in different angles - story, contrarian, list, question, before/after. You ship a week of content from one observation. The five-angle structure prevents the 'all my posts sound the same' decay that hits solopreneurs around month 3 of consistent posting. Pair this with the Power Prompts brand-voice extractor - paste your voice guide as a prefix and the posts come out sounding like you, not like every other LinkedIn post. Tested cleanest on Claude Opus 4.7.